Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Day In Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve - A Lifescape To Experience
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:48, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- A Day In Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve - A Lifescape To Experience (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This page has no context. Apparently is about a film but absolutely WP:TOOSOON. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:46, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 04:48, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 04:48, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: Well... it technically can be speedied as just being an infobox, but in the defense of the article creator they'd only just created the page minutes before people started tagging it for various types of deletion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as TOOSOON, but if speedy is available we might as well get on with it. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:15, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The "no context" speedy deletion was added 20 minutes after the article was created -- sufficient time for the author to have written at least one sentence about this film, which turns out to be a fairly well produced amateur film released directly to YouTube. Nicely done, but not notable in any way. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:18, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
*Comment: Why are we even discussing it? This discussion can easily be challenged via deletion-review (content/sources different from previous deleted one). I'll restore the speedy tag. They are welcome to re-create it with more content and possible sources that might exist (do not rely on Google search results for India-related topics.). Anup [Talk] 23:48, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. (doesn't qualify for speedy -enough content to identify subject of article). Anup [Talk] 00:58, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.