Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maragathakkaadu (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Article very similar to the prior one that was deleted. Account that has recreated it is without any doubt a sock. Thus G5 applies. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:04, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Maragathakkaadu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable upcoming film created by SPA/COI, no significant coverage in reliable sources (except this published back in October 2017) and no evidence of satisfying WP:NFILM. This article has previously been deleted after a previous AfD discussion. GSS (talk|c|em) 07:02, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 07:04, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 07:04, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- Weak keep has enough sources to make WP:N. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 07:36, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Jjjjjjdddddd: Enough? are you serious? and can you provide some? GSS (talk|c|em) 08:03, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- @GSS: I mean, the sources in the reference section. They seem to be just enough to put the film into the realm of notability, but I may be wrong, as some of the sources are in a language I don't understand. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 08:10, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Jjjjjjdddddd: FYI those sources are not reliable except Deccan Chronicle which was published back in 2017 and is insufficient to support notability also can you please explain your reason for declining G4? GSS (talk|c|em) 08:15, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- As for the G4, the deletion discussion before this one seemed to describe totally different content, and as for the sources, I don't see why they wouldn't be at least somewhat reliable. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 08:21, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- You're not an administrator and thus lack the ability to view deleted revisions.Please don't decline G4s except in cases, where you are very certain of a mistach between the two versions. Best, ~ Winged BladesGodric 09:13, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- As for the G4, the deletion discussion before this one seemed to describe totally different content, and as for the sources, I don't see why they wouldn't be at least somewhat reliable. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 08:21, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Jjjjjjdddddd: FYI those sources are not reliable except Deccan Chronicle which was published back in 2017 and is insufficient to support notability also can you please explain your reason for declining G4? GSS (talk|c|em) 08:15, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- @GSS: I mean, the sources in the reference section. They seem to be just enough to put the film into the realm of notability, but I may be wrong, as some of the sources are in a language I don't understand. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 08:10, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Jjjjjjdddddd: Enough? are you serious? and can you provide some? GSS (talk|c|em) 08:03, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Fair bit of overlap between the version created by User:Filmbluedeer Sept 2th 2017 and User:Chetanbathija on Sept 27th 2017. Obviously the later account is a sock of the first. Blocking and deleting per G5. Not sure if a formal SPI may still be useful. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:55, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.