Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reetika Khera

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 04:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Reetika Khera

Reetika Khera (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The topic of this article does not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for academics. Uncletomwood (talk) 04:47, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 09:41, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 09:41, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Espresso Addict (talk) 16:49, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

• Keep perhaps if the citations suggest a keepable article.Delete perhaps as there seem to be not convincing signs of the applicable notability aside from the imaginable Associate Professor at the Institute of Technology. Notifying DGG for analysis. SwisterTwister talk 23:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• Keep. Apparently notable based on the citations to her work: Google Scholar shows citations of 137, 139, 109, 102, 88, 83, 69, 65, 59 ... etc. I've added the information to the article. DGG ( talk ) 06:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
• Keep As DGG demonstrates, citations are conclusive pass of PROF c1. Agricola44 (talk) 17:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.