Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stockly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:48, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Stockly

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Stockly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find sufficient reliable news coverage independent of the topic here, per WP:CORP Loewstisch (talk) 08:13, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Loewstisch (talk) 08:13, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Software and France. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
• Delete because the majority of coverage is comprised of trivial mentions, and it reads as WP:ADS --Mind-blowing blow (talk) 07:48, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

  I'm not sure it's fair to say the TechCrunch, L'Usine Digitale, and Les Echos articles are trivial mentions; they're all focused on Stockly itself. But I will note that every article from the aforementioned three publications is authored by a journalist specialising in covering startups, per their respective bios, and I put very little faith in that sort of reporting ("Wow! Up-and-coming startup raised $x amount and promises to do $y thing and revolutionise the industry!" is the typical calibre). The Forbes, LSA, and Challenges articles do all appear to be trivial mentions though. GhostOfNoMeme 01:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:NCORP,WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGTRIV. No indication of signifance. Looks and reads like an advert. scope_creep^Talk 19:00, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.